219
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Computed Tomography Measurements as a Standard of Exophthalmos? Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Techniques

, &
Pages 647-653 | Received 25 Apr 2017, Accepted 14 Jan 2018, Published online: 29 Jan 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To compare measurements of exophthalmos using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) methods.

Methods: The CT data of 50 patients with thyroid eye disease were collected. The exophthalmos measurements were performed using both 2D and 3D methods. The protrusion of the globe center, the deviation angle of the ocular axis, and the distance between the globe center and the corneal apex were also recorded. The agreements between Hertel exophthalmometry and different CT measurements were analyzed, and the geometrical relationship between the protrusion of the corneal apex and globe center were analyzed.

Results: The measurement agreement from consecutive CT scans was significantly better using the 3D method than the 2D method (p < 0.05). The difference in exophthalmos measurements between the 2D and 3D methods was 0.9 ± 1.2 mm (p < 0.05), and the 3D exophthalmos measurement was more consistent with Hertel exophthalmometry. The exophthalmos of the corneal apex and the globe center agreed with the geometrical formula well. The location error between the corneal apexes marked on the 2D and 3D images was correlated with the vertical deviation angle of the ocular axis (r = 0.516).

Conclusion: The reliability of CT measurements performed using a 3D method was better than those obtained using a conventional 2D method. The 3D measurements were also more consistent with the exophthalmometry results. The exophthalmos of the globe center might be considered an important reference for patients with severe strabismus.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the supports of radiologists, and we appreciate all the colleagues providing help during the study in Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology, China [grant number 14411961800], and the Shanghai Health and Family Planning Commission [grant number 20164Y0144].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.