367
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Retina

Contrast Sensitivity in Early to Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

, IIIORCID Icon, , , , &
Pages 287-296 | Received 31 Mar 2021, Accepted 02 Aug 2021, Published online: 19 Aug 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose

Previous studies indicated that advanced age-related macular degeneration (AMD) affects contrast sensitivity (CS) in humans. The CS results for early/intermediate AMD patients are contradictory. The purpose of this study was to determine if CS testing discriminates early/intermediate AMD patients with normal acuity from normal patients.

Methods

Forty-nine subjects (25 control and 24 early/intermediate AMD patients) were chosen for this project. The age (p = .16) and acuity (p = .34) was not significantly different between the groups. The average simplified AREDS AMD grade for the AMD patients was 2.75 ± 1.03. Three CS functions employing a descending method of limits were measured at the fovea (1. stationary stimulus and, 2. 16 Hz counter-phase stimulus under photopic conditions and 3. the stationary stimulus viewed through a 2 log unit neutral density filter (mesopic condition, background luminance of 1 cd/m2)) and at 4 deg right or left of the fovea with a horizontally oriented sine wave grating (5 deg diameter) viewed on a VPixx monitor (luminance of 100 cd/m2).

Results

The early AMD patients were no different from the control patients for any test condition. The intermediate AMD patients were significantly different from the control patients for the mesopic CS function (p = .05). Post-hoc 2-sample t-tests for the intermediate AMD patients were significantly different from the control patients under the stationary photopic and mesopic conditions for the 1.5 cycle per degree stimulus.

Conclusions

Group differences in CS were only found in intermediate AMD patients. The loss in CS increased for the intermediate AMD patients under low light levels. Thus, CS may not be the optimal test to discriminate early AMD from control patients so other tests measured under dark adapted conditions should be investigated.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Lani May Centeno and Michael Habib for collecting some of the data and Loc Nguyen, PhD (California State University) for the statistical analysis.

Commercial relationship

Michael Engles, and James Burke are employees of AbbVie.

Disclosure statement

Michael Engles and James Burke are employees of Abbvie Inc. (formerly Allergan, Inc.). This project was partially funded by Allergan (prior to acquisition by AbbVie).

Additional information

Funding

Partially funded by Allergan (prior to acquisition by AbbVie).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.