166
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Management Brief

Efficacy of a Light Attractant for Increasing Trap Net Catches of White Crappies

, , , &
Pages 455-460 | Received 24 Jun 2010, Accepted 18 Feb 2011, Published online: 30 Jun 2011
 

Abstract

We evaluated the efficacy of trap nets fitted with a battery-operated, submersible light in the net mouth in increasing the catch rates of white crappies Pomoxis annularis by comparing the catch rate and size structure of white crappies collected by these nets with those of fish collected by standard (i.e., unlighted) trap nets in six Texas reservoirs. The catch rates of standard (mean = 16.3/net-night) and lighted trap nets (12.1/net-night) did not differ significantly. We found no significant difference in the catch of stock-size white crappies (≥130 mm total length [TL]) by standard (12.7 fish/net-night) versus lighted trap nets (9.9 fish/net-night); however, significantly fewer preferred sizes (≥250 mm TL) were taken by lighted (1.9 fish/net-night) than by standard sets (2.9 fish/net-night). The length-frequency distributions of the white crappies collected by each trap net treatment were similar and did not significantly differ in four of the five lakes tested. Our results suggest that trap nets fitted with artificial lights in the net mouth do not effectively increase catch rates for white crappies and may favor the collection of smaller size-classes than standard trap nets.

Received June 24, 2010; accepted February 18, 2011

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank field staff from TPWD Inland Fisheries districts 1A, 1C, 1D, 2E, 3A, 3B, 3C, and 3E for assistance with data collection. C. Bonds, A. Jubar, M. Howell, and M. Scott assisted with project design. Constructive comments provided by A. Barkoh, K. A. Bodine, and four anonymous reviewers greatly improved this manuscript. This study was supported by Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Grants F-30-R and F-148-M to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Inland Fisheries Division. Brand names disclosed for equipment utilized during this study do not constitute endorsement by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.