195
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
MANAGEMENT BRIEF

Comparisons of Precision and Bias with Two Age Interpretation Techniques for Opercular Bones of Longnose Sucker, a Long-Lived Northern Fish

&
Pages 790-795 | Received 23 Nov 2011, Accepted 05 Apr 2012, Published online: 27 Jul 2012
 

Abstract

Two preparations of opercular bones for estimating age of longnose suckers Catastomus catastomus revealed that annuli were obscured by dense bone and undetected when the whole operculum technique was used. By thin-sectioning the opercula, we removed the dense bone, revealing previously obscured annuli. Using opercula collected from older fish in Labrador, Canada, we found that the dense bone overgrowth led to an overall age bias of 1 year. When samples were broken into groups based on sectioned ages, however, there were minimal differences in age between the two techniques for fish age 6 and younger and a 2-year age difference for fish estimated to be age 10 and older. To compare precision in locating annuli between the two techniques, we calculated coefficient of variation values among independent determinations. Both techniques demonstrated low variance, however, age determinations had greater variation with thin-sectioning than with whole opercula interpretations. Therefore, we conclude that care must be taken when making annulus determinations from thin-sectioning. Due to the presence of dense bone overgrowth, associated with the whole operculum technique, we conclude a combination of both techniques would provide the most thorough procedure for interpreting opercular age for such long-lived fish (30–50 years).

Received November 23, 2011; accepted April 5, 2012

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Officers Gary O’Brien, Chuck Porter, and Mark Pritchett for their assistance with field collection. We also thank Donald Keefe for his assistance in sample preparation. Early versions of the manuscript were greatly improved by the editorial comments and suggestions of Ken Curnew. Additionally, we would like to acknowledge George Spangler's earlier editorial comments, which greatly enhanced the manuscript. The Inland Fish and Wildlife Division with the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador provided funding for this work.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.