Comparison of Detection Efficiency among Three Sizes of Half-Duplex Passive Integrated Transponders Using Manual Tracking and Fixed Antenna Arrays

Abstract

We compared detection efficiency for three lengths (12, 23 and 32 mm) of half-duplex (HDX) passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags for both manual tracking and fixed array applications. In a stream we used a wand-type manual tracking antenna and determined that detection efficiency was considerably influenced by tag size (i.e., 20% for 12 mm, 43% for 23 mm, and 81% for 32 mm) and water depth. Vertical and horizontal read range also varied among tag sizes (lower for smaller tags) and orientation (12-mm and 23-mm tags oriented perpendicularly failed to read in the horizontal test). Using a fixed PIT array, we also compared the detection efficiency of the same three sizes of PIT tags in Shorthead Redhorse Moxostoma macrolepidotum released into a fishway. Again, detection efficiency increased with tag size: 12 mm = 55.8 ± 9.2% (mean ± SE), 23 mm = 91.0 ± 1.8%, and 32 mm = 97.0 ± 1.5%. When using PIT telemetry on smaller fish species and/or life stages, we suggest that researchers consider the tag size, as the diminished detection efficiency of 12-mm tags could introduce a bias and impede the ability to address some research questions.

Received July 11, 2012; accepted September 20, 2012

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to C. Hatry, D. Hatin, F. Archambault, and G. Lemieux for providing field assistance at the Vianney-Legendre Fishway and to S. Maarschalk for help in Watts Creek. Comments by reviewers on an earlier version of the manuscript are appreciated. N.J.B. was supported by an Ontario Graduate Scholarship from the Ontario Student Assistance Program (OSAP) and the Province of Ontario, and S.J.C. was supported by the Canada Research Chair program. Additional support was provided by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council HydroNet and Research Tools and Instruments Grants Program grants to S.J.C. and the National Capital Commission. All fish were handled in accordance with the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care administered by the Carleton University Animal Care Committee (B12-6).