184
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
MANAGEMENT BRIEF

Estimating Trout Abundance with Cataraft-Mounted Dual-Frequency Identification Sonar: a Comparison with Drift Diving

, , &
Pages 528-536 | Received 22 Sep 2014, Accepted 08 Jan 2015, Published online: 21 May 2015
 

Abstract

We investigated the potential of dual-frequency identification sonar (DIDSON) deployed from a drifting cataraft for estimating abundance in rivers of Brown Trout Salmo trutta larger than 20 cm. We compared triplicate trout density estimates made by DIDSON with drift-diving density estimates in three reaches of a clear-water river in New Zealand. DIDSON density estimates were much lower (∼22% of drift-dive estimates, range = 7–33%) and less precise than drift-dive estimates (DIDSON CV = 0.13–0.47; drift diving CV = 0.15–0.17). Variation in detecting fish in the DIDSON field survey contributed substantially more (95%) to DIDSON count variability than did fish detection in the image files. Highest precision with DIDSON was achieved in the reach with the least shallow habitat and most uniform channel. Fewer person-hours were required to undertake the field component of DIDSON surveys than the drift dives (5 versus 8.3 h), but the substantial time spent on image review (3.3 h) made DIDSON surveys 34% more costly than drift dives in terms of overall effort. Despite observed shortcomings, cataraft-mounted DIDSON has utility as a noninvasive survey method for estimating abundance of large (>20-cm) fish, particularly in situations where turbidity is too high for visual counting methods to be effective.

Received September 22, 2014; accepted January 8, 2015

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank staff of Nelson/Marlborough, and West Coast Fish and Game Councils, as well as our colleagues at Cawthron for assistance with drift diving and other field work. Rowan Strickland (Cawthron) also assisted with counting trout from the DIDSON footage. River discharge data were provided by Tasman District Council. Roger Young provided helpful comments on a draft of the manuscript, as did two anonymous referees and an editor. The study was jointly funded by the New Zealand Foundation for Research Science and Technology (contract C01X0308), the New Zealand Fish and Game Council, and the Cawthron Institute.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.