314
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Pediatric asthma

Association between pediatric asthma care quality and morbidity and English language proficiency in Ohio

, MD, , MD, , MD, , PhD, , BA, , MSN, , PhD & , PhD show all
Pages 603-610 | Received 21 Dec 2017, Accepted 05 May 2018, Published online: 14 Jun 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Objective: Limited English proficiency can be a barrier to asthma care and is associated with poor outcomes. This study examines whether pediatric patients in Ohio with limited English proficiency experience lower asthma care quality or higher morbidity. Methods: We used electronic health records for asthma patients aged 2–17 years from a regional, urban, children's hospital in Ohio during 2011–2015. Community-level demographics were included from U.S. Census data. By using chi-square and t-tests, patients with limited English proficiency and bilingual English-speaking patients were compared with English-only patients. Five asthma outcomes—two quality and three morbidity measures—were modeled using generalized estimating equations. Results: The study included 15 352 (84%) English-only patients, 1744 (10%) patients with limited English proficiency, and 1147 (6%) bilingual patients. Pulmonary function testing (quality measure) and multiple exacerbation visits (morbidity measure) did not differ by language group. Compared with English-only patients, bilingual patients had higher odds of ever having an exacerbation visit (morbidity measure) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2–1.6) but lower odds of admission to intensive care (morbidity measure) (aOR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2–0.7), while patients with limited English proficiency did not differ on either factor. Recommended follow-up after exacerbation (quality measure) was higher for limited English proficiency (aOR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4–2.3) and bilingual (aOR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3–2.1), compared with English-only patients. Conclusions: In this urban, pediatric population with reliable interpreter services, limited English proficiency was not associated with worse asthma care quality or morbidity.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher's website. Supplemental Table. Sensitivity analysis of misclassification by language status for pediatric asthma patients with an asthma exacerbation visit, Hospital System A, 2011–2015

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.