124
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Diagnosis

The feasibility of eucapnic voluntary hyperpnoea for the diagnosis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in a community pulmonary practice

, DO, , MD, , CMA, , LPN & , MD
Pages 145-151 | Received 01 Jul 2020, Accepted 20 Sep 2020, Published online: 01 Oct 2020
 

Abstract

Objective

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is a common condition and is typically treated empirically based on symptoms alone. However, symptoms of EIB are typically nonspecific. Objective testing with eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea (EVH) is a sensitive and specific method to diagnose EIB and may suggest alternative etiologies such as exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO). To this point, EVH has been primarily utilized in large academic centers and in elite athletes. We intend to discuss the feasibility and clinical application of utilizing EVH to diagnose EIB in a community-based pulmonary practice.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 62 patients who completed EVH at The Oregon Clinic Pulmonary Clinic. Patients with inspiratory flow volume loop flattening or clinical symptoms were assessed by otolaryngology for evidence of EILO.

Results: 61 of 62 patients were included in the final analysis. 52 of 61 patients (85%) achieved an interpretable test with a maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) >60%. There was no difference in baseline spirometry or patient characteristics between those who were able to reach an MVV >60% and those who did not. 14 (23%) patients were diagnosed with EIB, 18 (30%) with EILO, and 4 (7%) were diagnosed with both EIB and EILO. Only 1 patient had a non-diagnostic evaluation with MVV <60% and negative for EIB and EILO.

Conclusions

EVH is a feasible diagnostic modality to evaluate for EIB in a community pulmonary practice and may suggest alternative conditions such as EILO. Accurate diagnosis is paramount to prescribing proper therapy, decreasing inappropriate medication use, and relieving exercise-induced symptoms.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.