564
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
MODELING AND SOURCE APPORTIONMENT

Apportionment of Ambient Primary and Secondary PM2.5 During a 2001 Summer Intensive Study at the NETL Pittsburgh Site Using PMF2 and EPA UNMIX

, , , &
Pages 925-940 | Received 05 May 2006, Accepted 04 Apr 2006, Published online: 01 Feb 2007
 

Apportionment of primary and secondary pollutants during a July 2001 intensive study at the National Energy Technology Laboratory is reported. PM2.5 was apportioned into primary and secondary contributions using PMF2, and results were compared with apportionment based on UNMIX 2.3. Input to PMF2 included PM2.5 mass data from four per 24 hour PC-BOSS filters and TEOM, NOx, NO2, O3, non-volatile, semi-volatile, and volatile organic material, elemental carbon, sulfate, and PIXE determined trace metals. Nine factors were identified in the PMF analysis. Six factors were associated with primary particles from crustal, mobile (gasoline and diesel), and three local sources high in trace metals. Three factors were associated with secondary sources. Two were associated with local emissions dominated by organic material, one was dominated by transported ammonium sulfate. UNMIX was able to identify the two major mobile sources, major local secondary source and transported secondary source. The three major sources of PM2.5 were identified as secondary transported material (dominated by ammonium sulfate) from west and southwest (46%), secondary material formed during mid-day photochemical processes (21%), and primary emissions from diesel (10%) and gasoline (8%) mobile sources. The other five sources accounted for the remaining 15% of the PM2.5. These findings are consistent with the majority of secondary ammonium sulfate in the Pittsburgh area resulting from distant transport, and so decoupled from local activity involving organic pollutants in the metropolitan area. In contrast, the major local secondary sources were dominated by organic material.

The participation of Brigham Young University in this program was funded under University Coal Research Grant DE-FG26-99FT40581 from the U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, to Brigham Young University, and by an Oak Ridge Institute for Scientific Exchange appointment for Delbert J. Eatough. Reference in this report to any specific commercial product, process, or service is to facilitate understanding and does not necessarily imply its endorsement or favoring by the U.S. Department of Energy.

Notes

a Units are all ng/m3.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.