Abstract
Comparisons of aerosol optical depths (AODs) determined from several types of Sun photometers operating side by side as part of four different networks (GAW PFR, AERONET, SKYNET, and NOAA/ESRL aerosol monitoring programs) were made at 6 different environmental stations to evaluate the different types of current state-of-the-art instruments under different aerosol loading conditions. A comparison between AERONET CIMEL and GAW PFR at a high altitude calibration site, Mauna Loa, shows an excellent agreement with 0.001 bias for 500 nm AOD. AODs obtained from direct Sun-pointing instruments are within 0.01 bias, though these results are similar to or slightly larger than those given in previous short-term intensive studies. These results suggest that well-maintained networks of direct Sun-pointing instruments developed by different companies/institutions can provide quality-assured AOD data across the globe to the aerosol-climate research community. The poorer agreement between a hemispherical field-of-view (FOV) MFRSR and the finite FOV Sun-pointing instrument is found to be due to uncertainty in the angular characterization of the MFRSR optics.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Korean Meteorological Administration R&D programs under grant CATER 2006-4104, and BK 21 program of SEES/SNU. We thank the AERONET principal investigators and Korea Global Atmosphere Watch Observatory (KGAWO) for providing the data.
Notes
1 Abbreviations: Mauna Loa—MLO, Boulder—BOU, Trinidad Head—THD, Bermuda—BRM, Gosan—GOS, Anmyon—ANM.
1The Sun photometer x was chosen as the reference instrument. Bias difference (BD), root mean square difference (RMSD), and standard deviation of the difference (SDD) are, 1/N∑1 N (y i − x i ), √1/N∑1 N (y i − x i )2, and √∑1 N [(y i − x i ) − BD]2/N − 1, respectively. The percent difference is calculated as [(y-x)/x * 100%].