1,331
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Direct Measurement of Aircraft Engine Soot Emissions Using a Cavity-Attenuated Phase Shift (CAPS)-Based Extinction Monitor

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1319-1325 | Received 10 Jan 2011, Accepted 19 May 2011, Published online: 27 Jun 2011
 

Abstract

The optical properties of soot particles in plumes emanating from a high bypass turbofan aircraft engine (V2527) were measured at distances of 40–80 m behind the engine with a cavity-enhanced phase shift (CAPS)-based extinction monitor (known as the CAPS PMex) and a multi-angle absorption photometer, both operating at wavelength ∼630 nm. Integrated plume measurements from the two instruments were highly correlated with each other (r 2 > 0.99, N = 12) and with measured carbon dioxide emission concentrations. Ancillary measurements indicated that the soot particle volume-weighted mobility diameter distribution peaked at 60 nm with a full width at half maximum of ∼60 nm. The soot single scattering albedo determined using the absorption and extinction measurements under engine idle conditions was 0.05 ± 0.02 (where the uncertainty represents 2σ precision), in agreement with previous measurements of aircraft exhaust. The engine soot emission index (mass soot per mass fuel burned) for this particular engine, derived from these measurements and a wavelength-specific mass absorption coefficient and the measured in-plume carbon dioxide concentrations, was 225 ± 35 mg kg−1 at engine idle conditions. These results plus more limited data collected from in-use aircraft on the runway indicate that the CAPS extinction monitor can provide (with an appropriate albedo correction) a credible measurement of the engine soot emission index in situations where the time response and sensitivity of particle absorption monitors are not otherwise sufficient.

Acknowledgments

The NASA Small Business Innovation Research program supported the preparation of this manuscript. The authors thank United Air Lines, and specifically its Chicago Airport Operations, Line Maintenance and Operational Engineering organizations for their kind and generous assistance in the conduct of these studies. We also acknowledge the ACRP02–03a program for providing the opportunity to perform the ODR-2010 measurements. Matthew Marich and Aaron Frame of City of Chicago are greatly thanked for their cooperation and support during the measurements. We also thank Ray Hoffelt, O’Hare Airport Operations Chief, for providing detailed runway activity data.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.