![Sample our Physical Sciences journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110819/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Physical-Sciences.jpg"})
Abstract
Particle concentrators allow exposure to controlled levels of concentrated ambient particulate matter (PM) over a broad range of concentrations. The performance of these systems can be influenced by the physicochemical characteristics of PM and so it is vital to characterize the concentrators at a given site. The quasi-ultrafine PM (<0.2 μm), fine PM (0.15–2.5 μm), and coarse PM (2.5–10 μm) concentrators at the Southern Ontario Center for Atmospheric Aerosol Research (SOCAAR), University of Toronto, were characterized as a part of the “Health Effects of Aerosols in Toronto (HEAT)” campaign held during February–March, 2010. The full size distributions of ambient and concentrated particles were simultaneously measured in terms of number, surface area, and volume using high time-resolution instruments. Examination of the complete size distribution, including the unconcentrated particles beyond the cutpoints of the concentrator systems, revealed that particles in the unconcentrated size ranges made significant contributions to the particle number and surface area present in the concentrated airstreams of fine and coarse concentrators. Further transients in the ambient ultrafine particle concentrations were evident as dampened signals in these concentrated airstreams. The ultrafine concentrator exhibited a significant size shift when the ambient particle size distribution had a mode ≤30 nm. Overall the fine and coarse concentrators provided a reasonable concentrated reproduction of the ambient PM mass while questions remain regarding the representativeness of the ultrafine concentrator.
Copyright 2012 American Association for Aerosol Research
Acknowledgments
Funding for SOCAAR was provided by the Canadian Foundation for Innovation, the Ontario Innovation Trust, and the Ontario Research Fund. Operational funding for this study was provided by NSERC (Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada) and CIHR (Canadian Institutes of Health Research). We also thank Gang Lu for his help in setting up the GRIMM dust monitor.
