395
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The use of transmission electron microscopy with scanning mobility particle size spectrometry for an enhanced understanding of the physical characteristics of aerosol particles generated with a flow tube reactor

ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon &
Pages 279-295 | Received 10 Oct 2022, Accepted 10 Jan 2023, Published online: 21 Feb 2023
 

Abstract

Aerosol particles are found throughout the atmosphere with considerable variety in morphological characteristics and chemical composition. Identifying and characterizing these particle attributes is a significant step toward improving our understanding of atmospheric chemistry. Many methods exist for measuring the size and spreading of Aitken mode particles, but there are few studies rigorously comparing the results generated between approaches in this field. Here, we compare two methods for assessing aerosol particles – scanning mobility particle size spectrometry (SMPS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Aitken mode particles consisting of salt seed particles and seed particles coated with α-pinene secondary organic material were produced in a flow tube reactor. The same populations of particles were analyzed using both techniques to facilitate direct comparison. For ammonium sulfate particles impacted onto carbon and Si TEM substrates, diameters increased by +0% to +30% when compared to the suspended electrical mobility diameters, an unexpectedly wide range for a single component system. Coated particles had unpredictable diameter differences, sometimes evaluated at larger and sometimes smaller sizes after impaction when compared to the corresponding SMPS electrical mobility diameter, from −34% to +60%. While all particles were generally round in shape, variation in particle morphology was also observed in coated samples. Between 0% and 98% of particles displayed obvious phase separation suggesting more population-level diversity than expected from these particle generation processes. Characterizing the differences between TEM and SMPS results better elucidates the role of a substrate where present and shows nonequivalence in particle size distributions obtained from different instruments.

Copyright © 2023 American Association for Aerosol Research

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank J. N. Dawson for preliminary contributions to the project. We also thank W. Auker and A. K. Hendrickson-Stives for assistance with particle and substrate characterizations respectively. We gratefully acknowledge D. D Dutcher for help with generation of secondary organic material at the Pennsylvania State University.

Additional information

Funding

E.C.T., E.-J.E.O., and M.A.F. gratefully acknowledge support from NSF AGS-1916758. D.N.H., D.E.K., and M.V.J. gratefully acknowledge support from NSF AGS-1916819 and Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.