247
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Measurement of 100 nm monodisperse particles by four Accurate methods: Traceability and uncertainty

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 323-333 | Received 09 Oct 2023, Accepted 08 Jan 2024, Published online: 12 Feb 2024
 

Abstract

Accurate measurements of particle diameter are necessary for quantitative characterization of key aerosol properties including the Cunningham slip correction factor, charging probability, diffusion coefficient, coagulation coefficient, and optical properties. In this study, we use four techniques to measure the diameter of nominal 100 nm reference spheres having a distributional standard deviation of less than 2 nm. The instruments used are a differential mobility analyzer (DMA), atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and an electrical-gravitational aerosol balance (EAB). All four measurements are traceable to SI units at National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) or at National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST). This study includes quantitative estimates of the measurement uncertainty for each technique. It finds that the measured average particle diameter is within 3% for all the methods, with at least some overlap in all the estimated uncertainties using a 95% confidence interval. Nevertheless, the difference between the EAB results and the other methods may become significant as they are separately intended to be used in the manner described here for the traceable certification of future nanoscale particle size standards. Possible reasons for the differences are incorrect or inadequate accounting for surface residue for aerosol measurements, adhesion-force distortion for the AFM measurements, e-beam shrinkage for the SEM measurements, slip correction uncertainty for the DMA, and work function variability of the electrodes for the EAB.

EDITOR:

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge Kavuri P. Purushotham (NIST) for performing SEM imaging.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

KJD was supported in part by a grant from the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Materials Measurement Science Division [Award No. 70NANB17H057].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.