Impactor than impinger and filter is more commonly used for bioaerosol sampling because of direct collection without post-collection sample processing. In this study, sampling fungal performance of microbial impactors with different sampling velocities and cut-point diameters was assessed. It was demonstrated that biological recoveries of Penicillium citrinum spores were ob served to be similar to those of two yeast cells, Candida famata var. flareri and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa . In addition, it was indicated that sampling performance of Burkard samplers was relatively better than those of Andersen 1-STG and MAS-100 samplers. Moreover, sampling time was indicated to not significantly influence fungal recoveries of the three evaluated impactors.
Free access
Sampling Performance of Impactors for Fungal Spores and Yeast Cells
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.