Abstract
AbstractPurpose: To explore the diagnostic value of immunoscintigraphy compared to CT and/or MR imaging in the diagnosis of local recurrence (LR) of rectal cancer.Material and Methods: Forty-six patients suspected of having LR of rectal cancer were retrospectively studied. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) scintigraphy findings were compared to CT and/or MR in all patients, and with data from surgery and morphology (31 patients), biopsy (7 cases) and follow-up (8 patients).Results: CEA scintigraphy was not complementary to CT and/or MR in the detection of LR. Two false-positive and 14 false-negative diagnoses of LR occurred with CEA scintigraphy. Distant metastases including metastatic lymph nodes were found by this method in only 7 of 27 patients with proven metastases. CT/MR were able to demonstrate these metastases in 21 of 27 patients.Conclusion: Accuracy and sensitivity of CEA scintigraphy in the detection of LR and distant metastases is lower than that of CT and/or MR. However, CEA scintigraphy seems to have a high specificity and could therefore be used in patients with a strong clinical suspicion of LR but negative CT/MR investigations. Available diagnostic methods have limitations in differentiating between benign, post-treatment changes and LR of rectal cancer and in staging of malignant disease.