Abstract
AbstractPurpose: To study the incidence of adverse events after i.v. injection of MR contrast agents in a Chinese population. A comparison was made between an ionic contrast agent (dimeglumine gadopentetate, Magnevist) and a non-ionic contrast agent (gadodiamide, Omniscan).Material and Methods: During a 24-month period, 2,049 Chinese patients who randomly received an i.v. bolus injection of either Magnevist or Omniscan were investigated. All patients were questioned for the presence of any generalized or localized adverse reaction on the following day after the MR examination according to a standardized questionnaire.Results: Three hundred and nine out of 2,049 patients (15%) reported an adverse event. There was a higher incidence of adverse events in patients receiving Magnevist as compared to those receiving Omniscan injection. All reported adverse events were clinically mild and required neither treatment nor hospitalization.Conclusion: There was a higher incidence of adverse reaction in patients receiving Magnevist than in those receiving Omniscan.