3,785
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLES: RADIOTHERAPY

Anal sphincter dysfunction in patients treated with primary radiotherapy for anal cancer: a study with the functional lumen imaging probe

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 465-472 | Received 12 Dec 2017, Accepted 06 Feb 2018, Published online: 15 Feb 2018
 

Abstract

Background: Sphincter-sparing radiotherapy or chemoradiation are standard treatments for patients with anal cancer. The ultimate treatment goal is full recovery from anal cancer with preserved anorectal function. Unfortunately, long-term survivors often suffer from severe anorectal symptoms. The aim of the present study was to characterize changes in anorectal physiology after radiotherapy for anal cancer.

Method: We included 13 patients (10 women, age 63.4 ± 1.9) treated with radiotherapy or chemoradiation for anal cancer and 14 healthy volunteers (9 women, age 61.4 ± 1.5). Symptoms were assessed with scores for fecal incontinence and low anterior resection syndrome. Anorectal physiology was examined with anorectal manometry and the Functional Lumen Imaging Probe.

Results: Patients had a median Wexner fecal incontinence score of 5 (0–13) and a median LARS score of 29 (0–39). Compared to healthy volunteers, patients had lower mean (±SE) anal -resting (38 ± 5 vs. 71 ± 6, p < .001) and -squeeze pressures (76 ± 11 vs. 165 ± 15, p < .001). Patients also had lower anal yield pressure (15.5 ± 1.3 mmHg vs. 28.0 ± 2.0 mmHg, p < .001), higher distensibility, and lower resistance to flow (reduced resistance ratio of the anal canal during distension, q = 5.09, p < .001). No differences were found in median (range) rectal volumes at first sensation (70.5 (15–131) vs. 57 (18–132) ml, p > .4), urge (103 (54-176) vs. 90 (32-212), p > .6) or maximum tolerable volume (173 (86–413) vs. 119.5 (54–269) ml, p > .10).

Conclusion: Patients treated with radiotherapy or chemoradiation for anal cancer have low anal resting and squeeze pressures as well as reduced resistance to distension and flow.

Acknowledgments

We thank nurses Gitte Sørensen, Margit Majgaard and Kirsten Haupt for their assistance in data collection and patients for participating.

Disclosures statement

Hans Gregersen was one of the inventors of the FLIP technology and owns minority shares in Crospon Ltd. that manufactures FLIP. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

The study was supported by the Danish Council for Strategic Research, Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation, the Karen Elise Jensens Foundation and the Danish Cancer Society.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.