Comparison of 3D conformal radiation therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy in patients with endometrial cancer: efficacy, safety and prognostic analysis

Abstract

Introduction: Adjuvant whole-pelvic radiation therapy (WPRT) improves locoregional control for high-intermediate stages I–III endometrial cancer patients. Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) tends to replace the standard 3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) technique used in trials.

Material and methods: Consecutive patients with stages I–IIIc endometrial cancer treated between 2008 and 2014 in our department with post-operative 3DCRT or IMRT WPRT were studied retrospectively. Patients with cervical involvement underwent additional low-dose rate vaginal brachytherapy. The impact of the WPRT technique on local control, tolerance, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed. Clinicians evaluated routinely acute radiation toxicity each week during radiation therapy and late toxicity during standard follow-up consultations.

Results: Median follow-up was 50 months (range: 6–158). Among the 83 patients included, 47 were treated with 3DCRT and 36 with IMRT. There was no difference in patient characteristics between groups. The 5-year locoregional control and DFS rates were 94.5% and 68%, respectively. No significant difference was found between the 3DCRT and IMRT groups in terms of survival, with 5-year OS rates of 74.6% and 78%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, age over 68, stage > T1 and grade 3 were independently associated with shorter DFS and OS. Seven patients (8.4%) had grades 3–4 acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity with five patients (10.6%) and two (5.4%) in the 3DCRT and IMRT groups, respectively (p = .69). One case (1.2%) of late grade 3 GI toxicity was observed treated in 3DCRT.

Conclusions: IMRT seems to be a safe technique for the treatment of endometrial cancer with a trend towards decreased acute GI toxicities. Results of the phase 3 RTOG 1203 trial are needed to confirm these results.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.