462
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Infectious disease

Quality of life of HIV-infected patients who switch antiretroviral medication due to side effects or other reasons

, , , &
Pages 2039-2046 | Received 20 May 2016, Accepted 19 Aug 2016, Published online: 20 Sep 2016
 

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among HIV patients following switch from a first- to second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen.

Research design and methods: This was an observational study of adult HIV patients in the US at 35 academic and community health centers. Patients were required to be switching an antiretroviral regimen for the first time at the enrollment visit. Patients were assigned to a study cohort based on whether the switch was due to treatment-related side effects or for any other reason as reported by their physician. Patients completed the Medical Outcomes Study–Human Immunodeficiency Virus (MOS-HIV) health survey, the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale Short Form (DASS-21), and the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire–status (HIVTSQs) at the enrollment visit (baseline) and a follow-up survey was completed approximately 4 weeks later. The within cohort change in survey measures from baseline to follow-up was assessed by two-sample paired t-test.

Results: Patients who switched their ART regimen due to treatment-related side effects (n = 50) had statistically significant improvements (p < .05, baseline to follow-up) in mean Physical and Mental Health Summary scores (MOS-HIV scale) and in all three HIVTSQ summary scores. Patients who switched for other reasons (n = 44) did not experience statistically significant improvements in these same measures.

Conclusions: HIV patients whose regimen was switched due to treatment-related side effects experienced an improvement in QOL following the switch. Physicians should take the potential impact on QOL into consideration when deciding on a switch in ART regimen, particularly when patients are intolerant of their current treatment. The results are based on a patient survey and may have been influenced by recall and response bias.

Transparency

Declaration of funding

This study was supported by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co. Inc.

Declaration of financial/other relationships

E.M.M. has disclosed that he was an employee and shareholder of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. at the time this study was conducted. P.T.J., A.G.H., and T.B. have disclosed that they are employed by Optum. Optum was paid by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. to conduct this study. A.W.W. has disclosed that he was a consultant to Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. for selection of PRO measures. He is also a consultant to BMS, Genentech, Johnson & Johnson, Otsuka, and Pfizer.

CMRO peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Acknowledgments

Jesse Potash, Optum, provided medical writing assistance. Michael Saag, University of Alabama at Birmingham, provided input on study protocol development.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.