458
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Cardiovascular

Drug-delivering endovascular treatment versus angioplasty in artery occlusion diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 95-105 | Received 05 Feb 2017, Accepted 23 Aug 2017, Published online: 06 Nov 2017
 

Abstract

Objective: The best management of patients with femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal artery occlusion disease is not clear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in patients with femoropopliteal or infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease.

Methods: Medline, Cochrane, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were searched for randomized controlled trials from 1 January 2000 until 30 June 2016.

Results: Compared with PTA, significant benefits in favor of DCB and DES were found for target lesion revascularization (TLR) (OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.66, p = .001 for DCB; OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.32 to 0.81, p < .001 for DES). Primary patency rate was greater with DCB (p = .001) and DES (p < .001) than PTA. Compared with PTA, a significant reduction in mortality was observed in the DCB group (p = .039) but not in the DES group. Subgroup analysis found a lower rate of TLR and a higher rate of primary patency in the active group (DCB and DES) compared with the control group (PTA) in patients with femoropopliteal arterial occlusion (p ≤ .016) but not in patients with infrapopliteal arterial occlusion (p ≥ .063). Mortality was similar between active replacement and control groups both in the femoropopliteal arterial occlusion and the infrapopliteal arterial occlusion subgroups (all p > .05).

Conclusions: Significantly better TLR and primary patency rate were found in the drug-delivering endovascular treatments compared with the PTA group for patients with femoropopliteal arterial occlusion but not for patients with infrapopliteal arterial occlusion.

Transparency

Declaration of funding

This manuscript was not funded.

Author contributions: X.C.: guarantor of integrity of the entire study; study concepts; J.L.: study design; C.Z.: definition of intellectual content; Y.H.: literature research; J.J.: data acquisition; X.W.: statistical analysis; D.L.: manuscript preparation; T.S.: manuscript editing; M.L.: manuscript review. All authors have read and approved the final version to be submitted.

Xudong Chen, Jianhui Li, Chengfei Zheng, Yunjun He, Junjun Jia, Xiaohui Wang, Donglin Li, Tao Shang and Ming Li

Declaration of financial/other relationships

All authors declared that they have no competing financial interests. A peer reviewer on this manuscript has declared working for Medtronic on projects related to the IN.PACT Admiral drug-coated balloon.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.