458
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Oncology

Treatment sequencing for the care of patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in the United States

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 469-476 | Received 20 Aug 2020, Accepted 16 Dec 2020, Published online: 02 Feb 2021
 

Abstract

Objectives

Therapeutic advances for the treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have led to additional options for care. This observational study was designed to describe emerging treatment patterns and survival outcomes.

Materials and methods

Flatiron Health’s oncology electronic health records database was to identify eligible patients who were age 18+ who initiated second-line therapy for NSCLC Survival analyses were conducted using Kaplan Meier methods and Cox proportional hazard model using SAS 9.4. both unadjusted and adjusted, using generalized propensity score, to account for imbalances between groups.

Results

The 10,060 eligible patients from Dec 2014 to Feb 2019 were 52.6% male; mean age 67.1 years; 70.3% white; 26.0% squamous/70.0% non-squamous (4.1% not specified); and 92.7% were treated at community practices. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were used by 79.9% of the cohort during any line of therapy; 12.1% and 53.7% used ICIs during first- and second-line therapy, respectively. There was heterogeneity in treatment sequencing, as the three most common first→second line sequences accounted for 7.7% (carboplatin + paclitaxel→nivolumab), 5.0% (carboplatin + pemetrexed→nivolumab), and 3.8% (carboplatin + nab-paclitaxel→nivolumab) of the total population, respectively. Unadjusted median overall survival was 21.1 months (95% confidence interval, CI: 20.5–21.6) from metastatic diagnosis. Median survival was 23.0 months (95% CI, 22.3–23.6) for non-squamous and 18.1 months (95% CI, 17.3–18.8) for squamous disease.

Conclusion

There is heterogeneity in sequencing strategies that limit the ability to conduct robust comparative effectiveness research of treatment sequences. Since few patients follow a similar treatment trajectory, comparative effectiveness research will be challenged to identify treatment sequences with sufficient sample size.

Transparency

Declaration of financial/other relationships

All authors are employees of Eli Lilly and Company.

Author contributions

LMH, CM, AO and ZLC were involved in the conception and design of this study. The analysis was conducted by XIL and ZLC. The interpretation of the data was conducted by all authors. The manuscript was drafted by LMH. All authors revised and contributed to the intellectual content and approved the final version for submission.

Acknowledgements

None stated.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.