Abstract
Background: The clinical experience with protease-inhibitor (PI) triple regimen appears disappointing regarding effect, side effects, high work load, and costs. This real-world study evaluates baseline and emerging resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) and their significance for treatment outcome.
Method: Thirty-six genotype 1a/b patients treated according to Swedish recommendations during 2011–2013 with triple therapy including pegylated interferon and ribavirin in combination with a protease-inhibitor, either boceprevir (BOC) or telaprevir (TVR), were retrospectively evaluated. Frozen serum samples from the patients were tested for resistance with pan-genotypic population sequencing.
Results: Overall, 56% (20/36) of the patients achieved sustained viral response (SVR). The SVR was comparable between BOC (64%; 9/14) and TVR (50%; 11/22) (p = 0.07), and the IL28B type non-CC (48%; 12/25) and CC (46%; 6/13) (p = 0.77). The SVR was higher in patients without cirrhosis (89.5%; 17/19) (p < 0.0005), in treatment-naïve patients (70%; 14/20) (p = 0.02), and those with low viral load (<800,000 IU/mL) (66.7%; 8/12) (p < 0.0002), compared to those with cirrhosis (17.6%; 3/17), treatment-experienced (37.5%; 6/16), and high viral load (>800,000 IU/mL) (50%; 12/24).
Conclusion: PI triple regimes were highly effective in treatment-naïve patients without cirrhosis, but in this real-world cohort an inferior effect was evident in cirrhotic and treatment-experienced patients. Although tested on a limited sample, the baseline resistance testing seems to have no impact on prediction of therapy outcome. The reason could be that the baseline RASs T54S and V55A have relatively low resistance towards BOC and TVR. Emerging RASs, mainly R155K, with known high resistance to BOC and TVR were frequently found in non-responders.
Acknowledgements
The important contribution of the staff at the Department of Infectious Diseases, and Mia Wadelius and Hugo Khonke at the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, is gratefully acknowledged.
T.W. and E.L., during their doctor’s studentship in the Department of Infectious Diseases, collected data from the patients’ notes and filed them in a data base. M.K. did the search for stored blood samples and was responsible for the logistic measures and the laboratory work on HCV resistance; she also did parts of the revision of the manuscript, interpretation of resistance data, and revision of tables. A.L. put all the materials together into a final manuscript and did the statistics and tables. J.L. was the advisor in the interpretation of resistance data and also did the revision of the manuscript.
Disclosure statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Midori Kjellin
Midori Kjellin, MSc, PhD student at Clinical Microbiology, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University.
Terése Wesslén
Terése Wesslén, MD student, at Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital.
Erik Löfblad
Erik Löfblad, MD student, at Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital.
Johan Lennerstrand
Johan Lennerstrand, PhD, Associate Professor at Clinical Microbiology, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University.
Anders Lannergård
Anders Lannergård, MD, PhD, Chief Physician at Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital.