740
Views
79
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Stratigraphy and chronology of late Quaternary andesitic tephra deposits, Tongariro Volcanic Centre, New Zealand

, &
Pages 115-206 | Received 19 Jul 1993, Accepted 13 Nov 1994, Published online: 30 Mar 2010
 

A stratigraphy and chronology of andesitic tephras erupted from Mt Ruapehu, and other volcanoes of Tongariro Volcanic Centre, is constructed from the tephra record preserved on the southeastern Mt Ruapehu ring plain. Here, tephras of late Quaternary age (c. 22,500 years B.P. to present) are found interbedded with local laharic and fluvial deposits, and with distal rhyolitic tephras from Taupo and Okataina Volcanic Centres.

Tephras are identified from their field characteristics and stratigraphic positions relative to dated rhyolitic tephra marker beds. The radiocarbon ages of these rhyolitic tephras provide a chronology for the andesitic tephras, dating back to 22,500 years B.P.

All tephras erupted from Tongariro Volcanic Centre are grouped into two subgroups: the Tongariro Subgroup (redefined) and the newly defined Tukino Subgroup. Tephras identified on the southeastern Mt Ruapehu ring plain are grouped into seven formations on the basis of lithology: Ngauruhoe Formation [dated c. 1,850 years B.P. ‐ present], Tufa Trig Formation [dated c. 1,850 years B.P. ‐ present], Mangatawai Tephra [dated c. 2,500 years B.P.], Papakai Formation [dated c. 9,700–2,500 years B.P.], Mangamate Tephra [dated c. 9,780–9,700 years B.P.], Pahoka Tephra [dated c. 10,000–9,800 years B.P.], and Bullot Formation [dated c. 22,500–10,000 years B.P.]. Tephras erupted from Mt Ruapehu are grouped into the Tufa Trig Formation, Papakai Formation, and Bullot Formation. Papakai Formation comprises both tephra and volcanic loess.

The stratigraphy and chronology of the seven formations are detailed, and revisions to the earlier stratigraphy of Topping (1973, 1974) are discussed. The distributions of principal tephra marker beds are shown, and tephra volumes (all < 0.2 km3) calculated from isopach maps wherever possible.

Notes

Department of Geography & Geology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Department of Soil Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.