1,817
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review articles

A review of the damage caused by invasive wild mammalian herbivores to primary production in New Zealand

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 20-52 | Received 18 Jul 2019, Accepted 31 Oct 2019, Published online: 18 Nov 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Wild mammalian herbivores can compete with domestic livestock and damage other types of production systems. We reviewed damage by wild mammalian herbivores, excluding rodents, to primary production in New Zealand and assessed whether primary producers alter stocking rates in response to changes in forage availability following pest control. Given the dearth of information on the damage caused by wild mammalian herbivores to many production systems, we primarily focused on their damage to agriculture. With the exception of the substantial damage that brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) and European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) cause, there are no quantitative estimates of pasture depletion by other wild mammalian herbivores on New Zealand farmland. Estimates of dry matter consumption by wild mammalian herbivores, converted to stock unit equivalents, suggest that several species can substantially reduce stocking rates when they occur on farmland. Quantitative data on the damage they cause to horticulture and silviculture are lacking, but damage to coniferous seedlings has been recorded for possums, wallabies (Notamacropus spp.), and some species of deer (Cervus spp., Rusa spp., and Dama dama). The process that primary producers use to decide whether to control wild mammalian herbivores includes complex social and economic factors, but quantitative information is important for weighing up the expected costs and benefits of pest control. However, it is unclear how primary producers manage livestock in response to increases in forage availability following pest control. The paucity of quantitative data on wild mammalian herbivore damage to production assets is a substantial knowledge gap. Key research priorities are (i) understanding how damage varies with pest density (critical information for effective pest management) and (ii) and how primary producers alter stocking rates following reductions in pest density.

Acknowledgements

This review was commissioned by Environment Southland and funded by the New Zealand Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment (Envirolink large advice grant: 1841-ESRC502). We thank Phil Cowan and Ray Prebble (Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research), Bruce Burns (University of Auckland), Mandy Tocher (Ryder Environmental), and an anonymous reviewer for commenting an earlier version of this review paper, and Terry Parminter (KapAg) for advice about the decision-making process primary producers use for pest control.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

ORCID

A. David M. Latham http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4403-6588

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by MBIE Envirolink large advice grant [Grant Number 1841-ESRC502].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.