Abstract
Pot experiments were done to compare the effectiveness of soil-applied ZnSO4, ZnO, and ZnEDTA, foliar-applied ZnSO4 (0.25% solution), and a Zn frit for the correction of Zn deficiency in sweet corn on two calcareous soils and a non-calcareous soil from Niue. Effectiveness was determined from dry matter yields and Zn uptake by sweet corn grown for 43—54 days. Soil-applied ZnSC4, ZnO, and ZnEDTA resulted in equal dry matter yields on all three soils; foliar-applied ZnSO4 was equal in effect to soil-applied Zn on two of the soils, but less effective on the more calcareous soil (pH 7.7). The Zn frit was tested on only one soil (pH 7.4) and was less effective than the other Zn sources. Zinc, soil-applied as ZnO and ZnEDTA, was more available to sweet corn than Zn as ZnSO4.