Abstract
This paper provides a systematic review of instruments that have the potential to measure the quality of project-based science and technology (S&T) learning environments in elementary school. To this end, a comprehensive literature search was undertaken for the large field of S&T learning environments. We conducted a horizontal bottom-up analysis of the aspects measured by the retrieved instruments and their operationalisation. We distinguish 11 components. The most frequently evaluated components are prior knowledge and backgrounds, connection with reality, science as inquiry and level of initiative and group work. Overall, the results suggest a considerable diversity in the operationalisation of the components found. Particularly, for connection with reality, science as inquiry and level of initiative and group work, this is related to (1) the object of measurement (e.g. variety in aspects evaluated) and (2) the extent to which the used concepts are clarified. Consequently, some scales, items and questions were found to be a closer fit with aspects of project-based learning environments than others. Additionally, most of the retrieved instruments cover science and not technology or project-based education. This review can be used when searching for a scale, item or question to measure particular aspects of S&T learning environments.
Notes
2. This item could also be classified in the group work component, although it does not fit in one of the categories we discerned.
3. ESOL stands for teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages.
4. According to Eick (Citation2011), the outdoor classroom can be conceptualised as outdoor experiences in nature, the wider environment.
5. The five essential features of inquiry-based teaching are: learners are engaged by scientifically oriented questions; learners give priority to evidence, which allows them to develop and evaluate explanations that address scientifically oriented questions; learners formulate explanations from evidence to address scientifically oriented questions; learners evaluate their explanations in light of alternate explanations, particularly those reflecting scientific understanding; learners communicate and justify their proposed explanations (NRC, 2000, p. 4, as cited in Bodzin & Beerer, Citation2003).