157
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Dissipation rates of dufulin residues in paddy, soil, and water determined by ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with photo-diode array detection

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 370-380 | Received 15 Apr 2013, Accepted 02 Oct 2013, Published online: 18 Nov 2013
 

Abstract

A sensitive and selective analytical method for dufulin detection was developed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with photo-diode array detection (UPLC-PDA). Dufulin analysis was carried out with 1 μl sample injection on BEH C18 column (50.0 mm × 2.1 mm i. d., 1.7 μm film thickness) thermostatted at 40°C with a mobile phase of methanol/water (58/42 by volume) at flow rate of 0.3 ml min−1. Dissipation rates of dufulin in paddy plant, soil, water, and brown rice in three districts in China were studied using the method developed. Dufulin (30% WP) was applied at two dosages, 337.50 g a. i. ha−1 (recommended dosage) and 506.25 g a. i. ha−1 (1.5 times the recommended dosage) in experimental fields in Guizhou, Anhui, and Tianjin provinces in China. The limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ) of dufulin were 2.5 and 7.5 μg kg−1, respectively. The average recoveries were 72.76–95.43, 97.84–101.7, 96.99–100.8, and 80.91–100.5% in paddy plant at four spiking levels (0.04, 0.20, 2.0, 50.4 mg kg−1), in water at three spiked levels (0.0025, 0.025, 0.25 mg l−1), in soil at three spiking levels (0.04, 0.13, 1.3 mg kg−1), and in brown rice at four spiking levels (0.05, 0.20, 2.0, 10.0 mg kg−1), respectively. Our results showed that half-lives of dufulin in paddy plant and water in the three districts were 7.7–11.3 and 2.1–4.8 days, respectively. At harvest, dufulin residues in brown rice samples collected 35 days after the last dufulin application at the recommended dosage were below 0.5 mg kg−1. Our results provided data to help establish appropriate application frequency and harvest intervals in the use of dufulin for rice pest control in China.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Institute for the Control of Agrochemicals, Ministry of Agriculture, P.R. China for financial support provided for the pesticide registration and residue project (No. 2011F308).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.