A call for a pluralist epistemological understanding in the assessment and evaluation of counselling

Abstract

The authors outline and posit the futility of the ‘paradigm war’ between reductionistic/positivistic and phenomenological/naturalistic philosophies within counselling evaluation, pointing out that the notion of such competition is itself based on positivist thinking. They trace attempts at creating a ‘truce’ in the war based on strict demarcation of territory. They conclude that in the longer term more might be gained by accepting the veracity of both philosophies and creating a pluralist model which will be more fully equipped to evaluate the human process of counselling.