1,083
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

South African higher education in the first decade of democracy: from cooperative governance to conditional autonomy

Pages 199-212 | Published online: 20 Aug 2006
 

Abstract

This paper tracks policies in the governance of higher education over the first decade of South Africa’s democracy. The first democratically elected government of 1994 was faced with the formidable task of dismantling the structures of apartheid education. The foundations for a new policy were laid by a National Commission that reported in 1996, and advocated a philosophy of ‘cooperative governance’ by a wide range of stakeholders. However, the government’s formal policy, articulated in a White Paper and legislation the following year, established a more directive role for the state. Successive amendments to the legislation culminated in a National Plan for Higher Education in which the state plays a strongly directive role, and seeks to recast the higher education landscape through extensive incorporations and mergers. While there is a strong case for state steering of public education in a country such as South Africa, where urgent attention to key issues of economic development and social justice is essential, the concept of cooperative governance is now a hindrance in finding the appropriate balance between the government’s responsibility to the electorate and institutions’ rights to academic freedom. ‘Conditional autonomy’, in contrast, allows both for the procedural role of the state in ensuring the effective use of public money and the substantive rights of higher education institutions to academic freedom in teaching and research.

Acknowledgements

This paper is based on work commissioned by the Council on Higher Education (see CitationHall et al., 2002; available at: http://www.che.ac.za). We are grateful to Thierry Luescher for his assistance, to Hugh Amoore and an anonymous reviewer for their insights, and to Saleem Badat and Lis Lange for their support and comments. The views expressed in the paper are our own.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.