1,151
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLES

High prevalence of Brachyspira spp. in layers kept in alternative husbandry systems associated with frequent species variations from end of rearing to slaughter

, , , , &
Pages 481-487 | Received 07 Feb 2017, Accepted 29 Mar 2017, Published online: 24 May 2017
 

ABSTRACT

A longitudinal survey was conducted to investigate the presence of Brachyspira species in layer flocks. A total of 66 layer flocks kept in alternative husbandry systems were sampled at three time points: end of rearing, at peak of lay and at end of lay. Content from caecal samples of freshly killed birds was cultured at each sampling time point and processed for further investigations. Gross pathological lesions in caeca were recorded during post mortem investigation. Spirochaetes were isolated from 50 flocks: three flocks were positive at all three sampling points, 25 flocks at two and 22 flocks at one sampling point, respectively. The presence of Brachyspira spp. could not be related to specific gross pathological caecal lesions or antibiotic treatments. The number of positive flocks increased with the age of birds. Furthermore, organic flocks were more often positive than flocks from barn systems. In total 80 spirochaetal cultures were obtained. B. intermedia (43.8%) was the most common species, followed by B. pulli (13.8%) and B. pilosicoli (12.5%). Brachyspira murdochii and B. innocens were found in 5.0% and 2.5%, respectively, whereas 11.3% of Brachyspira isolates could not be identified to species level. In 11.3% of the samples mixed infections were detected. Finally, the longitudinal survey revealed for the first time a possible shift in the Brachyspira species in a substantial number (32%) of layer flocks during their lifetime.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the Austrian Poultry Health Service (QGV) for the technical support.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

Parts of this study were supported by the Federal Ministry of Health, the Federal Ministry for Agriculture and Environment and the Vet Arbeitskreis Gefluegelforschung (VAG) under [grant number 100687 (LAGMUS)].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.