Evaluating the dynamics and efficacy of a live, attenuated Mycoplasma anserisalpingitidis vaccine candidate under farm conditions

ABSTRACT

The aim of the present study was to monitor the dynamics and to measure the safety and efficacy of a live, attenuated, thermosensitive Mycoplasma anserisalpingitidis vaccine candidate, namely MA271, in geese breeder flocks under field conditions. Two rearing flocks were vaccinated with MA271 at 4 weeks of age and boosted at 24 weeks of age by cloaca inoculation (1 ml) and eye-dropping (60 µl). The geese then were transported to multi-aged breeding farms. Two breeding flocks served as controls. Colonization of the cloaca by MA271 showed 75% maximum prevalence between 4 and 6 weeks after the first vaccination. Then the prevalence decreased to 25% until the cooler, humid fall months which coincided with the booster vaccination. Boosting raised cloacal colonization to 100%. No clinical signs were observed in the vaccinated birds. After transportation to five multi-aged breeding farms, the wild-type strain appeared as well as MA271 in three flocks. In one flock, the wild-type strain completely displaced MA271, while in one flock only MA271 was detected. Only wild-type strains were detected in the control flocks; however, due to an HPAI outbreak, both flocks were exterminated before the end of the study. Based on the available data, the median percentage of infertile eggs was 3.7-5.1% in the MA271 vaccinated flocks, and 7.7% in the non-vaccinated flock. In conclusion, MA271 can colonize the cloaca of geese under field conditions. MA271 proved to be safe and presumably protects against M. anserisalpingitidis-induced reproduction losses.

KEYWORDS:

• DIVA
• field trial
• goose
• Mycoplasma anserisalpingitidis
• M. sp. 1220
• NTG
• qPCR
• vaccine

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Data availability statement

All data are available in the manuscript and the supplementary materials.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the KKP19 (129751) grant of the National Research, Development and Innovation Office, Hungary, the SA-27/2021 grant of the Eötvös Loránd Research Network, the Project no. RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00001 which has been implemented with the support provided by the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), financed under the National Recovery Fund budget estimate, RRF-2.3.1-21 funding scheme and the support provided by the Ministry of Innovation and Technology of Hungary (legal successor: Ministry of Culture and Innovation of Hungary) from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund, financed under the TKP2021-EGA-01 funding scheme of the National Research, Development and Innovation Office. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.