627
Views
37
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Standardisation of bioelectrical impedance analysis for the estimation of body composition in healthy paediatric populations: a systematic review

, , , &
Pages 460-479 | Received 09 Feb 2017, Accepted 14 May 2017, Published online: 06 Jun 2017
 

Abstract

Background: Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) requires a high degree of standardisation in order to ensure valid and reproducible impedance measurements. The overall aim of this review was to study the degree to which BIA papers conducted in healthy paediatric populations (aged 0–17 years) were standardised.

Methods: Literature was identified on the basis of a systematic search of internationally-recognised electronic databases and hand searching of the reference lists of the included papers in order to identify additional relevant papers. The review was limited to lead-type BIA devices for whole-body, segmental- and focal impedance measurements. In total, 71 papers published between 1988 and 2016 were included.

To evaluate the degree of standardisation of the papers, a recently published review detailing critical factors that may impact on BIA measurements in children was used as a model for structuring and extracting data.

Results: There was a general lack of BIA standardisation, or its reporting, in the papers under review, which hinders comparison of data between studies and could potentially lead to erroneous measurements.

Conclusions: If the BIA technique should be accepted clinically for routine use in paediatric populations, there is a need for an increased focus on the importance of improved standardisation and its reporting in future studies. Consequently, this review contains recommendations for performing and reporting BIA measurements in a standardised manner.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank research librarian Hanne Caspersen, Aarhus University Library, for valuable assistance with the literature search process.

Disclosure statement

Author Ward consults for ImpediMed Ltd.; however, ImpediMed Ltd. did not have any input to or influence on manuscript preparation. Other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare concerning this work. No funding for this paper has been received.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.