254
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Innovations

Accuracy of an electrogoniometer relative to optical motion tracking for quantifying wrist range of motion

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 49-54 | Received 09 Sep 2019, Accepted 05 Jan 2020, Published online: 30 Jan 2020
 

Abstract

Methods for capturing wrist range of motion (RoM) vary in complexity, cost, and sensitivity. Measures by manual goniometer, though an inexpensive modality, provide neither dynamic nor objective motion data. Conversely, optical motion capture systems are widely used in three-dimensional scientific motion capture studies but are complex and expensive. The electrogoniometer bridges the gap between portability and objective measurement. Our study aims to evaluate the accuracy of a 2 degree of freedom electrogoniometer using optical motion capture as the reference for in vivo wrist motion. First, a mechanical system constructed from two plastic pipes and a universal joint mimicked a human wrist to assess the inherent accuracy of the electrogoniometer. Simulations of radial/ulnar deviation (R/U), flexion/extension (F/E) and circumduction were evaluated. Second, six subjects performed three RoM tasks of R/U deviation, F/E, and circumduction for evaluation of the in vivo accuracy. Bland–Altman analysis quantified the accuracy. The mechanical experiment reported greater accuracy than the in vivo study with mean difference values less than ±1°. The in vivo accuracy varied across RoM tasks, with mean differences greatest in the F/E task (7.2°). Smaller mean differences values were reported in the R/U deviation task (-0.8°) and the circumduction task (1.2°).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Douglas C. Moore, Kalpit N. Shah, and Erika Tavares for their assistance throughout this study and the preparation of the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Additional information

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number [P30GM122732] (COBRE Bio-engineering Core).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.