233
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Innovation

Development of a more clinically relevant bladder and urethral model for catheter testing

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 237-244 | Received 18 Nov 2020, Accepted 14 Feb 2021, Published online: 22 Mar 2021
 

Abstract

This paper sets out the rationale and design for a more physiologically representative bladder/urethral model than the current rigid funnel industry standard. We suggest this flexible model can better serve as a basis for evaluating new catheters. We investigated the parameters and the validation tests required to construct and test with more flexible materials. The protocol includes static and impact force tests, while measuring internal retention balloon pressure. We have designed a flexible elastomer bladder floor and urethral model and tested it with a Foley balloon catheter. The tests showed that the model could hold the catheter with static loads up to 0.7 kg, but that the catheter was pulled out by impact forces from dropped weights. The Foley catheter design and its associated standards make no provision to mitigate urethral injury in the surprisingly common event of removal with a filled balloon. Our design is a more realistic model for testing retention and extraction characteristics of a urethral catheter. Validation tests have confirmed the feasibility of measuring urethral dilation and balloon pressure, both under traction and during progressive deflation. We suggest this model improves upon the current standard tests and will enable the design of safer catheters.

Disclosure statement

The Flume Catheter Company has an interest in the development of a more clinically relevant model with a view to supporting the case for an alternative catheter design with anticipated patient benefits. RH is a shareholder in The Flume Catheter Company.

Additional information

Funding

This study was funded by the Flume Catheter Company Ltd (Farnham, UK). AC was supported by EPSRC grant EP/R02961X/1 and a University Research Fellowship.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.