405
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Pejorative phrases or innocent idioms? Exploring terms used by tomorrow’s doctors in relation to older people

, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
 

ABSTRACT

Older people are the “core business” for 21st century hospitals. Of concern, therefore, is negative stereotyping of older people by medical students. Through a bespoke teaching session for final-year medical students, we aimed to deconstruct the phraseology they employed in relation to older people and to drive attitudinal change among students. This study also aimed to discern whether there was a detectable difference in attitudes toward older people after the session. Forty-seven medical students participated. Students recorded in a “word-cloud” terms they associated with older people in hospital before and after the session. The University of California Los Angeles Geriatrics Attitude Scale (UCLA-GAS) was administered for pre-session. The intervention students, along with a control group, completed this instrument at the end of their placement. Content analysis of word cloud data was performed—an iterative, transparent, structured approach to analysis, along with external critique of findings and collaborative triangulation ensured rigor of analysis. Qualitative analysis demonstrated the use of pejorative and sometimes nihilistic terms. There were evidence of growing appreciation of the inherent complexity of caring for older people and increasing awareness of how healthcare systems can be challenging for older people. Quantitative analysis revealed that there is no statistical difference neither between the UCLA-GAS pre- and post-teaching nor the intervention and control groups. In conclusion, a bespoke educational intervention, designed to promote student reflection on their views toward older people in hospital, can be a catalyst to challenging superficial and stereotypical views.

Disclosure statement

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sponsor’s Role

The study’s sponsor (Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust) had no direct influence on design, methods, subject recruitment, data collections, analysis, or preparation of the article.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Ellen Tullo

Ellen Tullo As follows: study concept and design (JF, ET, JS), acquisition of subjects and/or data (JF), analysis and interpretation of data (JF, ET, JS), and preparation of manuscript (JF, ET, JS).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.