469
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

Regulation of human UDP-glycosyltransferase (UGT) genes by miRNAs

, , , &
Pages 120-140 | Received 12 Dec 2021, Accepted 25 Feb 2022, Published online: 11 Mar 2022
 

Abstract

The human UGT gene superfamily is divided into four subfamilies (UGT1, UGT2, UGT3 and UGT8) that encodes 22 functional enzymes. UGTs are critical for the metabolism and clearance of numerous endogenous and exogenous compounds, including steroid hormones, bile acids, bilirubin, fatty acids, carcinogens, and therapeutic drugs. Therefore, the expression and activities of UGTs are tightly regulated by multiple processes at the transcriptional, post-transcriptional and post-translational levels. During recent years, nearly twenty studies have investigated the post-transcriptional regulation of UGT genes by miRNAs using human cancer cell lines (predominantly liver cancer). Overall, 14 of the 22 UGT mRNAs (1A1, 1A3, 1A4, 1A6, 1A8, 1A9, 1A10, 2A1, 2B4, 2B7, 2B10, 2B15, 2B17, UGT8) have been shown to be regulated by various miRNAs through binding to their respective 3′ untranslated regions (3′UTRs). Three 3′UTRs (UGT1A, UGT2B7 and UGT2B15) contain the largest number of functional miRNA target sites; in particular, the UGT1A 3′UTR contains binding sites for 12 miRNAs (548d-5p, 183-5p, 214-5p, 486-3p, 200a-3p, 491-3p, 141-3p, 298, 103b, 376b-3p, 21-3p, 1286). Although all nine UGT1A family members have the same 3′UTR, these miRNA target sites appear to be functional in an isoform-specific and cellular context-dependent manner. Collectively, these observations demonstrate that miRNAs represent important post-transcriptional regulators of the UGT gene superfamily. In this article, we present a comprehensive review of reported UGT/miRNA regulation studies, describe polymorphisms within functional miRNA target sites that may affect their functionalities, and discuss potential cooperative and competitive regulation of UGT mRNAs by miRNAs through adjacently located miRNA target sites.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia [Grant ID 1143175 (R.M, R.A.M, P.I.M, D.G.H)]. The project was also supported by funding from the Flinders Foundation. R.A.M is supported by a Cancer Council/SA Health Beat Cancer Professorial Fellowship.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.