Abstract
We had younger and older adults complete two tasks that tested the attentional- and memory-based inhibition models of negative priming. One task violated May, Kane, & Hasher (1995, Psychological Bulletin, 118, 35-54) criteria for measuring just attentional inhibition, by including a repeated-target condition. The other task complied with these criteria and included a depth of processing manipulation, where participants selected prime targets based either on their letter-length (nonsemantic processing) or weight (semantic processing). On balance, results supported the memory model, because depth of processing clearly moderated younger adult negative priming, and older adults displayed negative priming only in the task satisfying the attentional-inhibition criteria (i.e., the depth of processing task). We conclude that memory factors moderate negative priming, and that May et al.'s criteria fail to predict when older adults will show the effect.