Abstract
A major challenge for inference regarding aging-related change in longitudinal studies is that of study attrition and population mortality. Inferences in longitudinal studies can account for attrition and mortality-related change as distinct processes, but this is made difficult when follow-up of all individuals (i.e., age at death) is not complete. This is a common problem because most longitudinal studies of aging either have incomplete follow-up or are still collecting data on subsequent outcomes, including time of death. A statistical approach is suggested for including time-to-death as a predictor in models with incomplete follow-up using a two-stage multiple-imputation procedure. An empirical example using data from the OCTO-Twin study is presented that shows the utility of his procedure for making inferences conditional on mortality when mortality data are incomplete.
Data analyzed in this study were from the longitudinal Origins of Variance in the Old-Old: Octogenarian Twins study that was supported by a grant from the National Institute on Aging (AG08861).
Notes
Note. N = 264. BD = Block Design. A dot represents an observed value whereas m represents missing values.