Publication Cover
Experimental Aging Research
An International Journal Devoted to the Scientific Study of the Aging Process
Volume 42, 2016 - Issue 1: Special Issue on Age, Hearing, and Speech Comprehension
389
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Age Differences in Language Segmentation

&
Pages 83-96 | Received 15 Aug 2014, Accepted 15 Aug 2015, Published online: 18 Dec 2015
 

Abstract

Reading bears the evolutionary footprint of spoken communication. Prosodic contour in speech helps listeners parse sentences and establish semantic focus. Readers’ regulation of input mirrors the segmentation patterns of prosody, such that reading times are longer for words at the ends of syntactic constituents. As reflected in these “micropauses,” older readers are often found to segment text into smaller chunks. The mechanisms underlying these micropauses are unclear, with some arguing that they derive from the mental simulation of prosodic contour and others arguing they reflect higher-level language comprehension mechanisms (e.g., conceptual integration, consolidation with existing knowledge, ambiguity resolution) that are common across modality and support the consolidation of the memory representation. The authors review evidence based on reading time and comprehension performance to suggest that (a) age differences in segmentation derive both from age-related declines in working memory, as well as from crystallized ability and knowledge, which have the potential to grow in adulthood, and that (b) shifts in segmentation patterns may be a pathway through which language comprehension is preserved in late life.

Notes

1 This study illustrates the importance of considering the role of literacy experience in studies of aging and language processing. Given that high attachments introduce long-distance dependencies, one might have easily interpreted older adults’ preference for low attachments as an issue of memory load. With a measure of print exposure, however, we were able to get a more accurate picture of the role of experiential factors in how prosodic phrasing impacts segmentation (cf. Swets et al., Citation2007).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.