240
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Adaptive rejection sampling with fixed number of nodes

&
Pages 655-665 | Received 31 May 2016, Accepted 10 Oct 2017, Published online: 06 Dec 2017
 

ABSTRACT

The adaptive rejection sampling (ARS) algorithm is a universal random generator for drawing samples efficiently from a univariate log-concave target probability density function (pdf). ARS generates independent samples from the target via rejection sampling with high acceptance rates. Indeed, ARS yields a sequence of proposal functions that converge toward the target pdf, so that the probability of accepting a sample approaches one. However, sampling from the proposal pdf becomes more computational demanding each time it is updated. In this work, we propose a novel ARS scheme, called Cheap Adaptive Rejection Sampling (CARS), where the computational effort for drawing from the proposal remains constant, decided in advance by the user. For generating a large number of desired samples, CARS is faster than ARS.

MATHEMATICS SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION:

Funding

This work has been supported by the Grant 2014/23160-6 of São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) and by the Grant 305361/2013-3 of National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq).

Notes

1 The possibility of applying ARS for drawing for multivariate densities depends on the ability of constructing a sequence of non-parametric proposal pdfs in higher dimensions. See, for instance, the piecewise constant construction in Martino et al. (Citation2015a) as a simpler alternative procedure.

2 The evaluation of V′(x) is not strictly necessary, since the function qt(x) can also construct using a derivative-free procedure (e.g., see Gilks (Citation1992) or the piecewise constant construction in Martino et al. (Citation2015a)). For the sake of simplicity, we consider the construction involving tangent lines.

3 In the following, we denote as Et] the acceptance rate, at the tth iteration, averaged over several (theoretically infinite) runs.

4 The best configuration S depends on the specific construction procedure employed for building the sequence of proposal functions q1, q2…, qt, ….

5 Clearly, the configurations of either all negative or all positive are discarded since they yield improper proposal pdf by construction.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.