ABSTRACT
When competing interests seek to influence a decision maker, a scientist must report a posterior probability or a Bayes factor among those consistent with the evidence. The disinterested scientist seeks to report the value that is least controversial in the sense that it is best protected from being discredited by one of the competing interests. If the loss function of the decision maker is not known but can be assumed to satisfy two invariance conditions, then the least controversial value is a weighted generalized mean of the upper and lower bounds of the interval.
Acknowledgments
The careful reading by two referees led to important improvements, especially the addition of Section 5. This research was partially supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN/356018-2009) and by the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Ottawa.