386
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Communication, social norms, and contraceptive use among adolescent girls and young women in Lilongwe, Malawi

, PhDORCID Icon, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , MA, , MPH, , PhDORCID Icon & , PhD show all
Pages 440-451 | Received 31 Oct 2019, Accepted 09 Apr 2021, Published online: 04 May 2021
 

ABSTRACT

In Malawi, 50% of adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) have had a first child by age 19 and 45% report their pregnancies as unintended or mistimed. Yet, uptake of contraception remains low. Understanding how interactions with social ties impact AGYW contraceptive use might explain low uptake beyond individual and environmental factors. Data are from Girl-Power, a study among sexually active AGYW, aged 15–24, in Malawi. We used logistic regression models to examine whether contraceptive communication and social norms (descriptive and injunctive) were associated with contraceptive use (non-barrier methods and condoms) and how associations differed across social ties (older women in the family, peers, and partners). The sample included 942 participants: 28% reported using non-barrier methods and 66% reported using condoms. Contraceptive communication with older women in the family (aOR: 1.48, 95% CI: 0.99, 2.20), peers (aOR: 3.12, 95% CI: 1.96, 4.96), and partners (aOR 5.15, 95% CI: 3.13, 8.48) was associated with non-barrier method use. Descriptive norms were associated with non-barrier methods among peers (aOR 2.57, 95% CI: 1.63, 4.96) but not among older women in the family (aOR: 1.22, 95% CI 0.80, 1.88). There were no associations among contraceptive communication, social norms, and condom use across older women in the family, peers, and partners. The findings highlight the need to consider the influence of social ties in the design of future family planning interventions and suggest that interventions that encourage interpersonal communication about contraception and target peer-based descriptive norms have the potential to impact uptake of non-barrier methods.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

NLB was supported by the National Institutes of Health Fogarty International Center [R25 TW009340] and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [T32 AI007001]. The Girl Power study is funded by Evidence for HIV Prevention in Southern Africa (EHPSA), a DFID program managed by Mott MacDonald. NER was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Mental Health [R00 MH104154].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.