294
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Profile of women choosing mixed-sex, women-only, and home-based cardiac rehabilitation models and impact on utilization

, MDORCID Icon, , PhDORCID Icon, , RN, PhDORCID Icon, , MDORCID Icon, , MD & , PhD, FAACVPR, FCCSORCID Icon
Pages 98-107 | Received 29 Jun 2021, Accepted 21 Dec 2021, Published online: 04 Jan 2022
 

ABSTRACT

This study compared characteristics and program utilization in women electing to participate in mixed-sex, women-only, or home-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR). In this retrospective cohort study, electronic records of CR participants in Toronto who were offered the choice of program model between January 2017-February 2020 were analyzed. There were 727 women (74.7% mixed, 22.0% women-only, 3.3% home-based) who initiated CR. There were significantly more women who were not working in women-only than mixed-sex (80.4% vs 64.1%; P = .009). Session adherence was significantly greater with mixed-sex (58.8 ± 28.9% sessions attended/25) than women-only (54.3 ± 26.3% sessions attended/25; P = .046); program completion was significantly lower with home-based (33.3%) than either supervised model (59.7%; P = .035). Participation in women-only CR may be less accessible. Further research is needed to investigate offering remote women-focused sessions or peer support.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Joan Kitchen, Sylvia Maksymiu, Merrisa Martinuzzi, Dr. Fernando Rivera Theurel, Marcella Calouro, Emily Joseph, Shital Shah, Lauren Jenkinson, Madeleine Flores-Hukom, Karen Dobson, Priscilla Gonsalves, Betty Chau, Holly Wykes, Ray Vickers, and Lucy Moniz, for sharing their expertise regarding model delivery and/or role in delivering women-only CR at the study sites.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Data availability

Due to the nature of this research, participants of this study did not agree for their individual-level data to be shared publicly, so supporting data cannot not be made publicly available. Data are available upon request to the corresponding author by qualified investigators with appropriate approvals.

Additional information

Funding

Sherry L. Grace is supported in her work by the Toronto General and Western Hospital Foundation and the Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.