Publication Cover
Hemoglobin
international journal for hemoglobin research
Volume 43, 2019 - Issue 2
92
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Polymorphisms of α-Globin Genes Compromise Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based α-Thalassemia Genotyping in Three Chinese Families

, , , , &
Pages 101-106 | Received 25 Jun 2018, Accepted 13 Mar 2019, Published online: 21 May 2019
 

Abstract

In practice, gap-polymerase chain reaction (gap-PCR) and reversed dot-blot are the two most frequently used molecular diagnostic methods for α-thalassemia (α-thal) genotyping. Here, we describe three Chinese individuals from three unrelated families in whom a polymorphism on the α-globin gene cluster led to diagnostic pitfalls. During general molecular diagnosis of thalassemia, three individuals with unexplained results were found. Blood or chorionic villus samples were collected from these three individuals and their family members. Hematological investigations and genetic tests were performed. In Family 1, a polymorphism of HBA2: c.301-24delinsCTCGGCC at the annealing site of the forward primer used in the PCR-reverse dot-blot assay was identified, leading to allele drop-out during the PCR amplification process. In Family 2, a synonymous mutation of C>T substitution at codon 125 of the α2 gene (HBA2: c.376C>T) was identified, leading to the failure of PCR-reversed dot-blot for the HBA2: c.377T>C (Hb Quong Sze or Hb QS) mutation. In Family 3, the size of the PCR fragment from the α2-globin allele carrying the HBA2: c.-771_-428del mutation was smaller and nearly equal to the size of the fragment corresponding to the –α4.2 (leftward) deletion; we also found that the HBA2: c.-771_-428del mutation was linked to a known HBA1: c.-673A>G mutation in this family. In conclusion, diagnostic errors may be caused by technical pitfalls or inherent properties of the DNA sample. All logical steps should be taken to monitor and thus preclude such events.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by funding from the Project of Social Development of Dongguan [201750715007443 and 201750715007181].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.