Abstract
This author is in general agreement with the arguments in Bostrom's (Citation2003) essay concerning theory–data interaction. Nevertheless, an examination of the issues raised in the essay from the standpoint of scientific realism lead to two different conclusions. First, the opening rationale is based on a nondefensible distinction between empiricists and interpretivists. Second, debates among paradigms are based on real ontological and epistemological differences, and the scientific realist's view of theory–data interaction accepts the validity of these differences.
Notes
Charles Pavitt is a professor at the Department of Communication, University of Delaware. Correspondence to: Charles Pavitt, Department of Communication, University of Delaware, Newark DE, 19716, USA. Tel: 302 831 8027; Email [email protected].