Twenty‐two interpersonal textbooks, published since 1975, were analyzed in an effort to determine if and how gender identity is being presented in the area of interpersonal communication. An overview of “traditional” and “androgynous” approaches to sex‐role development and an examination of symbols used to describe the roles were provided to document the validity of the word and theme content analysis measures employed. The analysis showed interpersonal texts favoring androgyny, with preference given to the masculine, mediated by femininity, in terms of power, problem‐solving, and self‐esteem. In terms of emotions and relationships, femininity is prescribed, mediated by masculinity.
Androgyny and pedagogy: An analysis of interpersonal communication textbooks, 1975–79
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.