Statue and case law provide little direct guidance as to student works. However, a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court decision defined the Work for Hire provisions of the 1976 Copyright Act in such a way that student‐producers would seem to be able to retain the copyright of their productions. Accordingly, recommendations are made concerning a contract between a school and a student acknowledging the student's copyright in the work but granting the school a non‐exclusive license to air the program. A prototype of such a contract is presented.
Student video productions: Who owns the copyright?
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.