![Sample our Communication Studies journals, sign in here to start your access, 2013 & 2014 volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5927/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Information-Science2.jpg"})
Abstract
Members of small groups do not always mention available information, and this leads to inferior decision making. A local model of participation was applied to information sharing discussions to evaluate the extent to which task-relevant judgments are related to comments that contain unique (i.e., data that only one member knows) and shared (i.e., known to all members) information. In addition, the model was applied to only “incorrect” groups, ones that did not choose the optimal solution. Findings revealed that the local model applied to incorrect groups in the sense that shared information figured prominently in the development and maintenance of judgments. Unique comments, however, played a limited role in the process. Other findings showed that shared contributions were not associated within groups, indicating somewhat skewed rates of participation. Discussion focuses on the distribution of variance related to judgments.
Notes
1. The formula for the target effect is where
is the estimated stable construct variance for the target effect,
is the unstable variance for the target effect,
and
are the stable and unstable construct variances for the relationship effect, respectively,
and
the stable and unstable reciprocity covariances, respectively, r is the number of items, and n group size (assuming equal groups). To obtain reliability for the perceiver effect, the stable and unstable construct variances for the perceiver effect are substituted into the formula in place of those for the target effect. The other terms remain the same. Finally, the reliability formula for the relationship effect is
with the terms as described above.
