This study investigated the relationship between orienting behavior and small group consensus. Employing a confederate to manipulate orientation behavior in three experimental conditions, thirty small group discussions were used to assess the effects of orientation on distance from consensus. Groups assigned to the High Orientation condition were significantly closer to consensus after discussion than groups in either the Low or No Orientation conditions. There was no significant difference between the Low and the No Orientation conditions. When total orientation behavior (manipulated and natural) was considered, an identical amount of perceived orientation behavior was found in the No and Low Orientation conditions. This finding paralleled the results obtained on distance from consensus.
An experimental study of the effects of orientation behavior on small group consensus
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.